1 free tool on this site · Know your customer requirements

Start Pro

KYC compliance: KYC Obligations

The KYC Obligations carries 4 published figures read from 3 sources' own pages, from 15 to 25 percent, read 17 October 2026.

Clientvo sells its own paid plan in this category (our pricing). It is not counted here: every figure in this index is another provider's own published price, read from its own page.

15 to 25 % Range of the published figures 4 published figures, not one market: read the rows
3 Sources with a figure of 15 read in full, 18 Oct 2026
3 of 15 Sources read that publish one 20% publish a figure at all
  1. FinCEN CDD Rule FAQs25 %
  2. Federal Register: Customer Due Diligence Requirements for Financial Institutions25 %
  3. Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 on EUR-Lex (CELEX)25 %
  4. Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 on EUR-Lex (CELEX)15 %
One figure per source, highest first.
Table view
RowValue
FinCEN CDD Rule FAQs25 %
Federal Register: Customer Due Diligence Requirements for Financial Institutions25 %
Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 on EUR-Lex (CELEX)25 %
Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 on EUR-Lex (CELEX)15 %

3 of the 15 named sources read in full publish a figure; 12 publish none, read 17 October 2026.

By jurisdiction

BreakdownMedianRangeSources
jurisdictionUnited States25%25 to 25%2
jurisdictionEuropean Union20%20 to 20%1

Every figure, with its source

One row per source: the figure the source's own page publishes, the page, and the day it was read. A figure that is not on a page we read is not on this one.

SourceFigureBreakdownRead
FinCEN CDD Rule FAQs25%United States2026-10-17
Federal Register: Customer Due Diligence Requirements for Financial Institutions25%United States2026-10-17
Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 on EUR-Lex (CELEX)25%European Union2026-10-17
Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 on EUR-Lex (CELEX)15%European Union2026-10-17
The sentence each figure was read from (4)
  • FinCEN CDD Rule FAQs, read 2026-10-17: Are there circumstances where covered financial institutions should consider collecting beneficial ownership information at a lower equity interest threshold under the AML program rules with regard to certain customers? When a legal entity is identified as owning 25% or more of a legal entity customer that is opening an account, is it necessary for a covered financial institution to request benefi
  • Federal Register: Customer Due Diligence Requirements for Financial Institutions, read 2026-10-17: Many commenters supported FinCEN's decision in the proposal to set the minimum threshold for equity holdings constituting ownership at 25 percent.
  • Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 on EUR-Lex (CELEX), read 2026-10-17: An ownership of 25 % or more of the shares or voting rights or other ownership interest in general establishes the beneficial ownership of a corporate entity.
  • Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 on EUR-Lex (CELEX), read 2026-10-17: To that end, that lower threshold should in general not be set at more than 15 % of the shares or voting rights or other ownership interest.

Read in full, publishes no figure

12 named sources were read in full on the dates shown and print no usable figure. They are counted, never filled in.

Methodology

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through our fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).

3 of the 15 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 12 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 1 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.

The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in % (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 38 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.

The fuller derivation this dataset is chartered to grow into (not yet what the figures above are; they are each source's own published figure as read): one row per jurisdiction per obligation, quoted verbatim from the instrument or the supervisor's own guidance with its effective date: who is an obliged entity, what must be identified and verified before the relationship starts, the beneficial-ownership threshold, what triggers simplified, standard and enhanced due diligence, the ongoing-monitoring and refresh rule, and the record-retention period.

The derivation is the cross-jurisdiction comparison nobody publishes as one table - the beneficial-ownership threshold and the EDD trigger list side by side across seven regimes, which regimes name a fixed refresh cycle and which require risk-based perpetual KYC, and changed-since, which is the news every time a rulebook turns (the EU's single rulebook applies from 10 July 2027; Australia's CDD reform runs a transition to 30 March 2029).

38 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.

Sources (16)
Cite or embed this figure

Cite or embed this figure

The KYC Obligations carries 4 published figures read from 3 sources' own pages, from 15 to 25 percent, read 17 October 2026.

3 of the 15 named sources read in full publish a figure; 12 publish none, read 17 October 2026.

KYC Obligations, jurisdiction United States: median 25 percent across 2 sources, read 17 October 2026.

KYC Obligations, jurisdiction European Union: median 20 percent across 1 source, read 17 October 2026.

Cite as: "Clientvo KYC Obligations", updated 2026-10-18, https://clientvo.com/datasets/kyc-obligations/.

Embed this figure (plain HTML, no scripts)

20 to 25 percent

3 published figures, KYC Obligations, across 3 sources, read 17 October 2026

Source: Clientvo KYC Obligations

Download the CSV (4 rows, computed 2026-10-18)

Start Clientvo ProKeep the files, $29 a month